‘Version’ Tagged Posts

The TV version of The Fifth Element on TNT, what happened to the McDonalds logos when the cops hit the truck?

OK, here's the deal. I sit here now to The Fifth Element on TNT and 40 minutes into it, the cops chase Korben Dallas & LeeLoo in the cabin and hit the...

 

OK, here’s the deal. I sit here now to The Fifth Element on TNT and 40 minutes into it, the cops chase Korben Dallas & LeeLoo in the cabin and hit the “truck”, which has red cargo containers. Now I used to own DVD, and I saw it in the theater. I remember almost photographically, that truck had McDonlad logo on the side and if it affects the truck burger fry all crates and cartons McDonald’s logo, which had on them. I remember because I laughed at the shameless product placement of all. But in this “Made for TV” version of the logo were all deleted and the McDonald’s drive through scene was also deleted. . . what’s up with that? McDonalds has to do something, TNT crazy? Is this a brand infringrment problem or what? What’s the deal here? Does anyone know for sure? Http://bp3. Blogger. com/_jv-vx0HDjF0/RjfzDCQaCvI/AAAAAAAAAqQ/NWxTvArNxsQ/s1600-h/PDVD_319. jpgI KNOW! It’s so funny, those little things like this notice. I think that’s my curse, because it so closely and with a semi-photographic memory:) LOLI hear ya, but I do not think that is valid in this situation. McDonald’s already paid their money to get their names in the film, from beginning an.Ich mean, think about it. . . If a company had every time their product was then Nike, Reebok, Hanes, Microsoft would have everything to sift out every time their products are made to pay in the air. I mean, every single time you see a computer on the TV should pay Microsoft a fee for each TV channel? I do not think that’s how it funktioniert.Auch, and that’s the main reason why I do not think that works is to answer, because someone will pay money to someone and revome the graphics from the film. I doubt any TV station would spend the money to logos of their programs every time, if the manufacturer refused to remove some kind of royalties zahlen.Eigentlich Royalty fees be paid to the owner of the goods, then, if anything, money should go to the manufacturers, but I do not think it works allen.Nein like, I do not think that it is not but you might think. . . I like diese.McDonlads have already bought their place in the film, the words will be completed and paid for, and if TNT will pay for the right to the movie, they receive all the ads and endorsements, which belongs to ; ren to play. You are correct that the reason that reality shows blur out stuff is, because no license fees have been paid to the producers of products, and they could be sued if the manufacturer wants their product with that show have to be a film “packed” means lack of a better word, and get the performance rights for the film that If the rights to the film as Ganzes.Nein paid someone to digitally removed on purpose, and I wonder who warum.Ich and noticed that the whole affair was sponsored with limited commercial interruptions “of Red Lobster . The only thing I can figure is Red Lobster paid the logos removed, because they do not want the competition, but it is strange erscheintHmm. . . Perhaps there is something bad blood between TNT and McDonalds? Interessant.Wer not have any kind of support about it?

2010 Blog Hatter Pro Version Is Here!

 

Converts @ 4-5%! Make Some Major Cash Off Of Promoting Blog Hatter Today! Sign Up As An Affiliate At Http://www.bloghatter.com/cb-jv-invite.php.
2010 Blog Hatter Pro Version Is Here!